The Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve is a protected area of Amazonian rainforest in my home
country of
Ecuador. I had visited the area several times, and was aware that six indigenous communities of
the Cofan, Siona, Secoya, Quichua, and Shuar peoples were living within its boundaries, but I knew
nothing of their relationships with the reserve.
On one occasion I was approached by a group of four leaders
of the Cofan people. Most
of the time, when encountering indigenous inhabitants of the area, I would converse
informally with them about various topics, but I had not had the opportunity to address
broader conservation and protected area issues with them. This time, however, I knew it
was going to be different; four indigenous leaders would not approach you dressed in
ceremonial costumes unless they had something very important to say.
What the Cofans told me was, unfortunately, a story that is all too common around the
world: the Wildlife Reserve had been established on their traditional lands without their
involvement and, as a result, the indigenous communities had lost their land and
resource rights. They had suddenly become strangers in their own homeland, or as
Valerio, a leader of the Quichua people later put it, "We went to sleep one evening in our
ancestral homelands, and the morning after we found ourselves within a government-
owned reserve - and this changed our lives forever".
The Cofans then told me about several of the problems they were facing. Two issues
struck me in particular. One of the Cofan leaders, named Randy, produced from his
woven bag a copy of a map of the reserve and showed me an area of riverine forest
bordering the Z?balo river which the reserve's management plan had designated as
strictly protected. Here the Cofans had ancestrally made selective cuts of trees
(thinning) and used the timber for house construction and other community needs - a
practice that the management plan had banned. "This ban is wrong," he said, "since our
practice is ecologically sound". I asked why, since riverine forests are of great ecological
importance and I would tend to agree with the banning of timber extraction in that area. In
response, he reminded me of a major flooding some five years back, when river
streams produced very serious damage, sweeping away villages and in places the
forest itself. "The majority of riverside trees will collapse into the river anyway, he said,
and not cutting them may cause floods to uproot them and thus increase the mass of
materials carried downstream, with higher destructive power".
The second problem had to do with jaguars - considered sacred by the Cofan people -
and tourists. The Cofans explained that tourist trails built in the reserve following the
management plan had fragmented jaguar territories, with the consequence that jaguars
would be less free to wander, encounter other jaguars, and reproduce, since they would
not cross human paths. "Jaguars adjust their territorial boundaries to coincide with our
traditional hunting trails, said Randy, so when building trails it is important to maintain
sufficient space between them not to affect their territorial needs". Rather than jaguars
being a danger to tourists, as sometimes one may think, here it was tourists (their
presence and infrastructures) being a danger to jaguars, because the reserve managers
had overlooked the Cofans' experience of creating trails that respect jaguar territories.
This conversation with the Cofan leaders was followed by many meetings with
government protected area officials, where I spoke in favour of finding solutions that
recognize the rights of indigenous communities to their lands and resources within the
Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve. The discussions were not easy since the country's
protected area law did not allow for such an accommodation. Eventually, however, the
government signed a co-management agreement with the Cofan people, admitting their
right to continue using and possessing their 80,000-hectare territory, and recognizing
indigenous zonation as an integral part of the reserve's management plan. The country's
first ever co-management agreement with indigenous communities, it paved the way for
other co-management arrangements in the country - although it remains the only
agreement guaranteeing both use and possession of traditional lands by indigenous
communities.
This story is certainly about making justice, but it is also about putting different systems
of knowledge and experience to work for the sustainable management of natural
resources, protected areas in particular. Some indigenous rights activists, when
confronted with this and similar examples, would argue that protected areas are not
really necessary where indigenous peoples live because they know how to manage their
lands and resources. But it is also true that protected areas can help indigenous and
traditional peoples protect their own lands, resources, and cultures. The Cuyabeno
Wildlife Reserve is in fact surrounded by oilfields, roads, villages, and cattle ranches.
Had the reserve not been created, the land would most likely have succumbed to
external threats and developments much too powerful for indigenous communities to
resist. "It has been to our advantage as a people to be able to claim national protected
area status, says Randy assessing the experience, and it has certainly been to the
advantage of the National Protected Area System to have us on site doing management
and enforcement work. We have used the combination of forces to halt petroleum
companies and miners, and our participation in the protected area has allowed us
freedom from pressures to cut down our forests and turn them into farmlands. It's been
a good combination".
In 1997, WWF granted its Award for Conservation Merit to Randy "in recognition of his
commitment to the defence of the rights of Ecuador's indigenous peoples; for his
achievements in the conservation of the territories and natural resources of the Cofan
people; and for his research on the cayman populations of the Napo river". In February
1999, the Ecuadorian government designated the Cofan, Siona, Secoya, and Quichua
territories of the reserve an 'Intangible Zone' - an area for the exclusive use of its
indigenous communities and the conservation of biodiversity.
WWF works with indigenous and traditional peoples in all regions of the world. As
examples, it supports sustainable wildlife management with indigenous communities in
Brazil, Cameroon, Namibia, Central African Republic, Thailand, and Zimbabwe;
traditional resource use and collaborative management of protected areas in Mongolia
and in the Koryak Autonomous Region of northern Russia; community-based actions for
the preservation of traditional knowledge, systems and practices in India; freshwater and
wetland conservation, using culture-based knowledge and management, in Australia,
Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea; research on traditional knowledge of predators in
Sweden; integration of cultural and spiritual values of traditional land management in
protected areas of Canada; conservation and sustainable use of wetlands in Malaysia;
conservation of marine biological diversity in the Miskito region of Nicaragua; traditional
weaving and salt-making by indigenous women in Fiji; community resource
management and development in the Solomon Islands; community land care in Papua
New Guinea; conservation of a biodiversity-rich traditional pilgrimage route of the Huichol
people in Mexico. These examples of WWF's work with indigenous and traditional
peoples illustrate what can be done for biodiversity conservation in such a way that it
also supports conservation and revitalization of traditional cultures.
Gonzalo T. Oviedo C.
October 2001
If you want to learn more about the efforts of the Cofan people to conserve
their traditional lands in
the Ecuadorian Amazon, visit: http://www.cofan.org/